August 21 1941|
Brooklyn, New York
|Field||Political economy, environmental economics, transport economics, political philosophy|
|Influences||Ludwig von Mises, Murray Rothbard, Ayn Rand|
Walter Edward Block (born 21 August 1941) is an Austrian School economist and prominent anarcho-capitalist. He is currently Professor of Economics at Loyola University New Orleans and Senior Fellow with the Ludwig von Mises Institute.
- 1 Life
- 2 Major contributions
- 3 Publications
- 4 Articles
- 5 See also
- 6 References
- 7 External links
Block was born in Brooklyn, New York to Abraham Block, a certified public accountant, and Ruth Block, a paralegal, both of whom Block has said were liberals. He earned his undergraduate degree in Philosophy summa cum laude from Brooklyn College, where he was a member of the varsity swimming team. Block earned his Ph.D. degree in economics from Columbia University and wrote his dissertation on rent control.Template:Citation needed Block, who is of Jewish background, self-identifies as a "devout atheist".
Block's early thinking life was characterized by egalitarian thought. In an interview by the Austrian Economics Newsletter, Block stated, "In the fifties and sixties, I was just another commie living in Brooklyn." Block credits his "conversion" to Libertarianism to personal meetings with Ayn Rand while he was an undergraduate student. Alan Greenspan was in attendance at some of these meetings. As Block describes it, "In 1963, when I was a senior at Brooklyn College, Ayn Rand came there to give a lecture. I attended, along with about 3,000 of my fellow mainly leftish students, in order to boo and hiss her, since she was evil incarnate. Afterward, the president of the group that had invited her to campus announced there was to be a luncheon in her honor, and anyone was welcome to take part, whether or not they agreed with her ideas. Not having had enough booing and hissing at Ayn in her formal lecture, I decided to avail myself of this opportunity to further express my displeasure with her and her views."
Block thereafter attended a luncheon with Rand, Nathaniel Branden, and Leonard Peikoff. After Block's challenging of several luncheon attendees, Branden forged an agreement with Block: "Nathan very graciously offered to come to the other end of the table with me for this purpose, but he imposed two preconditions: first, I would be honor bound not to allow this conversation to lapse with this one meeting, but would continue with it until we had achieved a resolution: either he would convince me of the error of my ways, or I would convince him of his. Second, I would read two books he would later recommend to me (Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand and Economics in One Lesson by Henry Hazlitt).
Although Block credits Ayn Rand, Branden, and other Objectivists with his initial interest in laissez faire theory in general, he says of Murray Rothbard that,
After I met Murray, it took him probably all of 15 minutes to convert me to the same anarcho-capitalist position I have held ever since.... In retrospect, before I had met Murray, I was nine tenths of the way toward embracing laissez faire capitalist anarchism; all I needed was a little push in the same direction I had already been going for some time.
Block now holds the Harold E. Wirth Endowed Chair in Economics at Loyola University in New Orleans. From 1979 to 1991, he was the Senior Economist with the Fraser Institute. In addition to his faculty position at Loyola, Block is also a Senior Faculty member of the Ludwig von Mises Institute for Austrian Economics. His most famous work is Defending the Undefendable, of which John Stossel said, "Defending the Undefendable... opened my eyes to the beauties of libertarianism. It explains that so much of what is assumed to be evil--is not." Lew Rockwell of the Mises Institute said this about Walter Block's active role in modern libertarianism:
Murray Rothbard, in his life, was known as Mr. Libertarian. We can make a solid case that the title now belongs to Walter Block, a student of Rothbard's whose own vita is as thick as a big-city phonebook, and as diverse as Wikipedia. Whether he is writing on economic theory, ethics, political secession, drugs, roads, education, monetary policy, social theory, unions, political language, or anything else, his prose burns with a passion for this single idea: if human problems are to be solved, the solution is to be found by permitting greater liberty.
Block, along with Robert Nozick, is one of the leading libertarian defenders of voluntary slave contracts, arguing that a slave contract is "a bona fide contract where consideration crosses hands; when it is abrogated, theft occurs". He critiques other libertarians who oppose voluntary slavery as being inconsistent with their shared principles. Block seeks to make "a tiny adjustment" which "strengthens libertarianism by making it more internally consistent." He argues that his position shows "that contract, predicated on private property [can] reach to the furthest realms of human interaction, even to voluntary slave contracts."
On February 17, 2006, Block publicly expressed his support for the Free State Project (FSP). He is quoted as saying,
You people are doing the Lord's work. The FSP is one of the freshest practical ideas for promoting liberty that has come out of the libertarian movement in the past few decades. May you succeed beyond your wildest dreams, and thus demonstrate in yet another empirical way the benefits and blessings of liberty.
Defending the Undefendable
Walter Block is possibly best known for his 1976 controversial book Defending the Undefendable, in which he defends pimps, drug dealers, blackmailers, corrupt policemen, and loan sharks as "economic heroes".
Friedrich Hayek wrote to Walter Block about this book: "Looking through Defending the Undefendable made me feel that I was once more exposed to the shock therapy by which, more than fifty years ago, the late Ludwig von Mises converted me to a consistent free market position. … Some may find it too strong a medicine, but it will still do them good even if they hate it. A real understanding of economics demands that one disabuses oneself of many dear prejudices and illusions. Popular fallacies in economics frequently express themselves in unfounded prejudices against other occupations, and showing the falsity of these stereotypes you are doing a real services, although you will not make yourself more popular with the majority."
Others, however, argue that Block's views are an example of what David Hume called "false philosophy" — philosophy that reduces complex matters to an overly-simple rule of conduct, an example of the moral corruption to which libertarianism is prone.
Walter Block's major contributions belong to the following fields:
Evictionism (in contrast to abortion)
According to this moral theory, the act of abortion must be conceptually separated into the acts of:
- the eviction of the fetus from the womb, and
- the killing of the fetus.
Building on the libertarian stand against trespass and murder, Block supports a right to the first act, but, except in certain circumstances, not the second act.
Walter Block believes the woman may legally abort if the fetus is not viable outside the womb, or
- the woman has announced to the world her abandonment of the right to custody of the fetus, and
- no one else has "homesteaded" that right by offering to care for the fetus.
Likewise, medical experimenters can treat the fetuses they have in their possession as laboratory "animals", as is their desire, contingent on one and only one stipulation: that no one else in the world wishes to raise these very young infants on their own. Thus Professor Block claims to offer an alternative to the standard pro-life and pro-choice positions.
According to Professor Block's negative homesteading theory, one can come to own misery — a state of being, or about to be, attacked — which one cannot legitimately pass on to someone else, without his permission. Should one however try to forward this misery onto someone else, this person has the right to defend himself from the "forwarding of misery". One has, however, not the right to initiate force against someone who only "holds" misery or has just been relieved of one's misery.
Professor Walter Block has proposed using revolutionary tribunals to hold trials for former Statists in a free society — which would likely have restitution, and possibly retribution-based elements.
In Professor Block's view, it is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for guilt (e.g., a violation of libertarian principles) and thus justification for punishment by the libertarian Nuremberg trials, that a person be a state official. For instance, people, who have used eminent domain to help enrich themselves, ought not to be allowed to keep their ill-gotten gains.
Serious attempts to trace property back to original owners would not normally be made. However, in cases where proof could be provided and this could be done, claimants would come forth to state their cases. Most likely, these trials would work via the homesteading of claims by first-comers, perhaps by insurance companies providing private dispute resolution services.
These trials would not be arbitrary, but would be brought by specific claimants, either specific victims, or defense insurance companies trying to improve market standing, and indirectly acting on behalf of many victims. The benefits might be seen in terms of lower premiums, which insurance companies homesteading claims against Statists could afford to offer to gain more customers. Another way that this might work is through outlawry trials. Offering insurance for private protection is a business, and companies cannot afford to insure individuals who are incredibly high risks. Individuals who might be the recipients of much hostility and attempted repossession in a free market — i.e., prominent Statists — would likely have difficulty finding protection agencies willing to protect them. Evidence-based trials could be held at the request of these individuals, in which case their guilt may or may not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Professor Block believes that government management of roads and highways is not only inefficient but also deadly. "Road socialism" causes the deaths of more than 35,000 people in the United States each year. And although many people blame highway deaths on alcohol, unsafe vehicles, or speeding, Block lays the blame on the government officials who manage the highway system. "It may well be that speed and alcohol are deleterious to safe driving; but it is the road manager’s task to ascertain that the proper standards are maintained with regard to these aspects of safety. If unsafe conditions prevail in a private, multistory parking lot, or in a shopping mall, or in the aisles of a department store, the entrepreneur in question is held accountable."
- Defending the Undefendable. 1976. (translated into Chinese, Dutch, French, Italian, Portuguese, Romanian and Russian) ISBN 0-930073-05-3
- A Response to the Framework Document for Amending the Combines Investigation Act. 1982.
- Focus on Economics and the Canadian Bishops.1983.
- Focus on Employment Equity: A Critique of the Abella Royal Commission on Equality in Employment (with Michael A. Walker; 1985.
- The U.S. Bishops and Their Critics: An Economic and Ethical Perspective 1986.
- Lexicon of Economic Thought (with Michael A. Walker.1988.
- Economic Freedom of the World, 1975-1995 (with James Gwartney, Robert Lawson; 1996.
- Labor Economics from a Free Market Perspective: Employing the Unemployable. 2008.
- The Privatization of Roads and Highways: Human and Economic Factors.(2009.
- The Case for Discrimination. 2010.
- Differing Worldviews in Higher Education: Two Scholars Argue Cooperatively about Justice Education. 2010.
- Building Blocks for Liberty. 2010.
- Yes to Ron Paul and Liberty. 2012.
- Zoning: Its Costs and Relevance for the 1980s ; 1980.
- Rent Control: Myths & Realities (Ed. with Edgar Olsen; 1981.
- Discrimination, Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity (edited with Michael A. Walker; 1982.
- Taxation: An International Perspective (Ed. with Michael A. Walker. 1984.
- Economics and the Environment: A Reconciliation,1985. (translated into Portuguese 1992) ISBN 0-88975-067-X
- Morality of the Market: Religious and Economic Perspectives (edited with Geoffrey Brennan, Kenneth Elzinga; 1985.
- Theology, Third World Development and Economic Justice (Ed. with Donald Shaw; 1985.
- Reaction: The New Combines Investigation Act. 1986.
- Religion, Economics & Social Thought (edited with Irving Hexham). 1986.
- Man, Economy and Liberty: Essays in Honor of Murray N. Rothbard (edited with Lew Rockwell; 1988.
- Breaking the Shackles; the Economics of Deregulation: A Comparison of U.S. and Canadian Experience (Ed. with George Lermer; 1991.
- Economic Freedom: Toward a Theory of Measurement. 1991.
- I Chose Liberty: Biographies of Contemporary Libertarians. 2011.
- "Katrina and the Future of New Orleans" Telos 139, Summer 2007.
- "Hayek's Road to Serfdom". Journal of Libertarian Studies (Center for Libertarian Studies) 12 (2): 339–365 (1996).
- "WalterBlock.com — Austrian Economist and Libertarian Theorist:". http://www.walterblock.com/. Retrieved 2012-05-31. "Walter Block, an Austrian school economist and anarcho-libertarian philosopher, is Harold E. Wirth Eminent Scholar Chair in Economics and Professor of Economics at Loyola University New Orleans and Senior Fellow with the Ludwig von Mises Institute."
-  Walter Block. "On Autobiography." LewRockwell.com. 4 December 2002.
- Block, Walter. "Open Letter to Ron Paul by Walter Block." LewRockwell.com. 28 December 2007. 
- "Radical Economics: An Interview with Walter Block." Austrian Economics Newsletter. Summer 1999.
- "Personal Reason." Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. 24 June 2007
-  Lew Rockwell. "Putting Opponents on the Hot Seat." LewRockwell.com. 3 May 2006.
- "Towards a Libertarian Theory of Inalienability: A Critique of Rothbard, Barnett, Smith, Kinsella, Gordon, and Epstein." pp. 39-85, Journal of Libertarian Studies, vol. 17, no. 2, p. 44, p. 48, p. 82 and p. 46
-  Walter Block's endorsement of the Free State Project. FreeStateProject.org. 17 February 2006.
- Defending the Truly Undefendable
- Defending the Undefendable
- On Defending the Undefendable
- Walter Block, Compromising the Uncompromisable: A Private Property Approach to Resolving the Abortion Controversy, Walter Block personal web site, originally published in Appalachian Journal of Law, Vol 4:1.
- Jakub Bozydar Wisniewski, "A Critique of Block on Abortion and Child Abandonment", LibertariansPapers.org, project of Ludwig Von Mises Institute, VOL. 2, ART. NO. 16 (2010)
- Block, Walter. 2010. A Libertarian Perspective on the Stem Cell Debate: Compromising the Uncompromisible, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. Vol. 35: 429-448
- Misery, proper, is a feeling of great unhappiness, suffering and/or pain.
- Jakobsson, Carl. 2010. The Negative Homesteading Theory: Rejoinder to Walter Block on Human Body Shields, Journal of Libertarian Studies. Vol. 22 Num. 1
- Walter Block, "Toward a Libertarian Theory of Guilt and Punishment for the Crime of Statism", in Property, Freedom, & Society: Essays in Honor of Hans-Hermann Hoppe, ed. Jörg Guido Hülsmann and N. Stephan Kinsella (Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2009), 137-148
- Walter Block, "Libertarian Punishment Theory: Working for, and Donating to, the State", Libertarian Papers 1, no. 17 (2009): 1-31.
- Block, Walter. 2009. Libertarian Punishment Theory: Working for, and Donating to, the State, Libertarian Papers. Vol 1, Num. 17
- Block, Walter. The Privatization of Roads and Highways: Human and Economic Factors; Auburn, AL: The Mises Institute, 2009
- Commentary by Walter Block for CNBC
- Biography and Article Archive at Mises.org.
- Media Archive at Mises.org.
- Defending the Undefendable
|This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).|
Template:Austrian economists Template:Anarchism