Libertarianism Wiki

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

3 February 2021

  • curprev 03:3303:33, 3 February 2021149.167.60.86 contribs 50,254 bytes −986 Bastiat refers to a legal principle. The NAP is a moral principle. Mill's harm principle, as explained in 'On Liberty,' allows extensive taxation, paternalism, and other things that go against the NAP. undo Tag: Visual edit
  • curprev 03:3103:31, 3 February 2021149.167.60.86 contribs 51,240 bytes −368 This Spencer quote doesn't give a version of the NAP. If it does, then John Rawls also endorses the NAP where he says the same in A Theory of Justice. undo Tag: Visual edit
  • curprev 03:3003:30, 3 February 2021149.167.60.86 contribs 51,608 bytes −374 Causing "harm" isn't the same as "aggressing." Locke provides many examples of legitimate "aggression" in the Treaties, including attacking people who threaten us but do not mean to. undo Tag: Visual edit
  • curprev 03:2703:27, 3 February 2021149.167.60.86 contribs 51,982 bytes −61 Neither Hayek, Locke, nor Nozick endorse the NAP. Nozick rejects it explicitly in ASU (1974.) Further to that, the NAP isn't -the- defining principle of libertarianism. Plenty of libertarians (Nozick, Huemer, Brennan, Locke etc.) reject it, because they believe self-ownership doesn't imply the NAP. undo Tag: Visual edit

13 May 2019

10 April 2016

5 April 2016

29 March 2016

2 September 2013

1 September 2013

28 November 2012

  • curprev 19:4919:49, 28 November 2012George Dance Message Wall contribs 52,783 bytes +52,783 Created page with "{{Libertarianism sidebar |expanded=Concepts}} The '''non-aggression principle''' (or '''NAP''', also called the '''non-aggression axiom''', the '''zero aggression principle''..."